http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/57324/title/To_catch_a_thief%2C_follow_his_filthy_hands
Shrimpy surprise from Science News on Vimeo.
I had a college history professor that made the same assumptions as you, i.e. everything being connected. He also linked in the fact that paper money would be non-existent and all funds would be electronic. Sounds feasible and not necessarily a bad thing, except when he tied it into a government conspiracy theory. For instance, a fugitive on the run for some random crime could have everything he owns shut down remotely. All funds would be locked, and with no cash alternatives... his options would be limited. His car would be shut down remotely (already possible with OnStar), and everything else he is known to own would become virtually useless. The advantages of such networking would be massive. But, the possible control that could be held is a bit daunting.
The Tiny T-Rex ( Raptorex) lived about 60 million years before T-Rex. It seems as though size was about the only evolutionary change between the two. It’s amazing to think that 60 million years of evolution wouldn't change it's bone structure at all. I was reading on National Geographic, and apparently scientist still believe that earlier ancestors to the two dinosaurs had longer arms. It's hard to image a T-Rex (large or small) with longer arms. Seems like it would throw off it's balance or something.
Some species of frogs have the ability to change sex without the influence of a pesticide. This is useful to ensure a species survival. Perhaps the chemical is triggering a survival instinct that the frog already possesses?
I could see it being potentially hazardous. Apparently 10% of the exposed frogs turned female, while the other 90% had lower fertility levels. Procreation of the species could take a serious hit if enough frogs were exposed.